| Author |
Message
|
| MEDIC1FF |
 Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:19 am Post subject: penny stock simulator |
 |
|
Investing Sr. Associate
|
| Does anybody know if JRW also runs the penny stock sim. It is listed at the bottom of the pages on this simulator, however it does not work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| JRW-910 |
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Administrator
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 182
This Month: 0
Location: New Jersey, USA
33187.66 e$
Net worth: 33,257.08
Portfolio Value: 19.42
Monthly Return: -35.20%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
 |
It was down when I took over the site(s) but we recently got it back up and running. Its basically in a 'testing' phase but I think its open to anyone to play with.
I just checked my portfolio and it seems correct.... what issues are you having?
-JRW |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jacobnbr1 |
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
| Why is the penny sim forum locked? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Im Not Warren Buffett |
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CFO
|
A conspiracy by big brother...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| NCSUPAGE |
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
Yeah, INWB is an agent of the government intent on destroying our ability to simulate purchasing Penny Stocks... We better keep an eye on him...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jacobnbr1 |
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
Back you evil beasts!!!
"Let he who be decieved, be decieved"
I am no longer a child of province..
Now back to your cages! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| NCSUPAGE |
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
| Cages? We don't need no stinkin' cages...We've got the Cardboard Box to stay in! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jacobnbr1 |
| Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
| NCSUPAGE wrote: | | Cages? We don't need no stinkin' cages...We've got the Cardboard Box to stay in! |
Oh those "Esquires" need cages alright, thats fo sho... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vetelmo |
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moderator
|
| jacobnbr1 wrote: | | NCSUPAGE wrote: | | Cages? We don't need no stinkin' cages...We've got the Cardboard Box to stay in! |
Oh those "Esquires" need cages alright, thats fo sho... |
Wouldnt that be interesting!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jacobnbr1 |
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
 |
| geb9696 |
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing VP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ithatheekret |
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Sr. Associate
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 51
This Month: 0
4011.94 e$
Net worth: 10,041.94
Portfolio Value: 6,030.00
Monthly Return: -37.02%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
Government – at least in the American society – was made by the people, for the people, and of the people. Government is NOT our creator and it has NO AUTHORITY OVER US.
That seems out dated , by a few centuries ....... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jacobnbr1 |
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
| ithatheekret wrote: | Government – at least in the American society – was made by the people, for the people, and of the people. Government is NOT our creator and it has NO AUTHORITY OVER US.
That seems out dated , by a few centuries ....... |
Nope.. still alive and well.
Are you an organic sovergn of a country or a FICTIONAL US CITIZEN OF THE STATE?
tic-toc,tic-toc,tic-toc... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jacobnbr1 |
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
Don't believe???
Let the supreame court decide 
"in common usage, the term "person" does not include the Sovereign, statutes employing the word person are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign." Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U. S. 653, 667 (1979) (quoting United States v. Cooper Corp., 312 U. S. 600, 604 (1941)). See also United States v. Mine Workers, 330 U. S. 258, 275 (1947).
The idea that the word "person" ordinarily excludes the Sovereign can also be traced to the "familiar principle that the King is not bound by any act of Parliament unless he be named therein by special and particular words." Dollar Savings Bank v. United STATEs, 19 Wall. 227, 239 (1874).
As this passage suggests, however, this interpretive principle applies only to "the enacting Sovereign." United States v. California, 297 U. S. 175, 186 (1936). See also Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Assn., Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 460 U. S. 150, 161, n. 21 (1983).
Furthermore, as explained in United States v. Herron, 20 Wall. 251, 255 (1874), even the principle as applied to the enacting Sovereign is not without limitations: "Where an act of Parliament is made for the public good, as for the advancement of religion and justice or to prevent injury and wrong, the king is bound by such act, though not particularly named therein; but where a statute is general, and thereby any prerogative, Right, title, or interest is divested or taken from the king, in such case the king is not bound, unless the statute is made to extend to him by express words."
U. S. Supreme Court Justice Holmes explained:
"A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the Right depends." Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U. S. 349, 353, 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
stock market game on the web. At eInvesting you compete for monthly cash prizes while you interact, make virtual dollars, purchase items, and trade in the realistic stock market simulator. We make investing FUN!
