| Author |
Message
|
| Dave Rathbun |
 Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:36 am Post subject: NCAA Football |
 |
|
CFO
|
This year has already provided a couple of surprises. Michican and Notre Dame, for example. They meet this coming weekend and both are 0-2. 
LSU has looked really good, but it's hard to know this early in the season if Virginia Tech was that bad, or LSU was that good. (LSU won their battle of the top-10's 48-7 last weekend, and made VT look like they didn't know how to play defense.)
USC has only played one game.
On the radio the other day, one commentator was suggesting that no polls be released until four games have been played. The BCS (Computer) poll already does that. What do you think, good idea? Bad idea? Don't care?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bayeauxguy |
| Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Sr. Associate
|
| Sounds like a good idea to me. I doubt that will happen but I would like to see that. While I was watching the LSU Vs. Va Tech game on ESPN, I was amazed at the commentators blatant biased attitudes toward LSU. They were still saying USC was the better team. The only way to shut these blow holes up is to play USC and introduce them to the SEC defense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Dave Rathbun |
| Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
CFO
|
LSU has - at least as far as it seems right now - a somewhat favorable schedule. Last season they played 4 top-10 teams on the road and split the games 2-2. (LSU ended 10-2 and ranked #3 in the nation.) This year LSU gets their toughest opponents at home. The next big test should be Florida, although Auburn lost this weekend they typically play LSU tough as well.
I don't follow PAC-10 football, so all I know about USC is what I have read. One thing I can say is that I highly doubt that the top 2 teams that we have today will be the top 2 teams come bowl season.
How about Oklahoma? Are they as good as their ranking, or have they benefited from weak oppontents? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bayeauxguy |
| Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Sr. Associate
|
| I think just about every other conference plays weak opponents. I don't see how anyone can argue the point that the SEC has the strongest teams. If you go undefeated in the SEC, thats pretty tough to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Dave Rathbun |
| Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CFO
|
I think you would get arguments from some, but not from me.  I think from top to bottom the SEC has some of the strongest teams in the country. I think the polls recognized that last year when they voted LSU #3 in the country even with two losses, given the schedule that they played. You flip-flop a couple of plays during the Florida / LSU game and it might have been LSU drubbing Ohio State in the championship game last year.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Do5 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Sr. Associate
|
| So no one is in for an upset this week in the Nebraska - USC game? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Dave Rathbun |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
CFO
|
Well, they get USC at home, but USC seems to travel well. Nebraska didn't look great in beating Wake Forest, but it's hard to know if that was Wake Forest having more talent or Nebraska struggling. One review I read was very critical of Nebraska's effort last week.
I would view this as yet another early-season test that won't show much. If USC wins, they're expected to win. If they win but struggle, is USC over-rated or Nebraska that good?
Ask again in a couple of weeks. Based on what I have read (have not seen either team play yet) I would pick the favorite and go with USC to win at Nebraska. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bayeauxguy |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Sr. Associate
|
I would predict that USC wins big over Nebraska.
USC is slightly over rated but they are still a powerful team with a strong defense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| prs1065 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 204
This Month: 0
5749.49 e$
Net worth: 49,311.49
Portfolio Value: 43,562.00
Monthly Return: -3.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
| LSU will win the win the bcs champoinship this year. you can take that to the bank! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wjmathewsx |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Associate
Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 24
This Month: 0
329.57 e$
Net worth: 8,306.85
Portfolio Value: 7,977.28
Monthly Return: -5.05%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
| Nebraska over USC 41-35....take it to the bank!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Dave Rathbun |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
CFO
|
I pick Michigan over Notre Dame this weekend, if anyone cares.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| prs1065 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 204
This Month: 0
5749.49 e$
Net worth: 49,311.49
Portfolio Value: 43,562.00
Monthly Return: -3.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
| always a good day in baton rouge,la when usc looses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bayeauxguy |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Sr. Associate
|
| prs1065 wrote: | | always a good day in baton rouge,la when usc looses |
Got that right!
Even better when Alabama loses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bayeauxguy |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Sr. Associate
|
| wjmathewsx wrote: | | Nebraska over USC 41-35....take it to the bank!!! |
Interesting...
I predict USC over Nebraska 30-3
By the way, I really hope you are right and I am wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| yandig |
| Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Manager
|
| I'll say USC 34, Nebraska 24 in a fairly close one... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
stock market game on the web. At eInvesting you compete for monthly cash prizes while you interact, make virtual dollars, purchase items, and trade in the realistic stock market simulator. We make investing FUN!
