| Author |
Message
|
| vetelmo |
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Moderator

|
| Im Not Warren Buffett wrote: | | Grimreaper wrote: | To be "fair" to Damon. I'm gonna post the prices ov the ones we show mutual intrust in...based on his starting prices on each. This way Damon will be able to review the performance ov his picks each time he decides whether or not he wishes to post ova heeeya at this bored. I'll be able ta do dat too.
CHK 37.25
GOOG 520.00
AAPL 116.00
NVDA 40.00 |
How is that "fair?" He already pointed out that you called for doom and gloom in these stocks 30, 40, 50% ago... getting to start over each time something rallies isn't really how it should work... |
Fair? Grim?? lmao!! He still has not acknowledged that his opinion has been proven simply irrelavent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Grimreaper |
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 CFO

|
| vetelmo wrote: | | Im Not Warren Buffett wrote: | | Grimreaper wrote: | To be "fair" to Damon. I'm gonna post the prices ov the ones we show mutual intrust in...based on his starting prices on each. This way Damon will be able to review the performance ov his picks each time he decides whether or not he wishes to post ova heeeya at this bored. I'll be able ta do dat too.
CHK 37.25
GOOG 520.00
AAPL 116.00
NVDA 40.00 |
How is that "fair?" He already pointed out that you called for doom and gloom in these stocks 30, 40, 50% ago... getting to start over each time something rallies isn't really how it should work... |
Fair? Grim?? lmao!! He still has not acknowledged that his opinion has been proven simply irrelavent. |
Well, he had his fax wrong since I chorted RIMM fer a GAHUGE gain on 1 occayzhun...plus several udder small gains, and I also said AAPL would take out 97.50 when it wassa at $80. I'm just takin his spewage o'da goowidge and puttin da numbas to it...He did say "Yeah...GOOG will drop $100 in a single day from the $700 level" Like me said bafo...summa ya's gots da guts ta admit dat you bees completely anna totally clueless. Udders gotsta have it prooveded to ya. All I'm doin is takin anudder clueless clown and puttin him through da Reaper smackdown. It ainna like he called DA BOTTOM on da housing mawket when TOL wassa at 29.50 er sumthin. It's actually werser than that! ...you gotta problum wit dat?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Grimreaper |
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 CFO

|
| damon wrote: | Grim,
You seem to have missed the point of my post. I'm not declaring any of these to be a screaming buy at today's levels. I'm just showin' folks how these stocks have performed in the 12-18 months since you were knockin' em. So to be "fair" to you, maybe I ought to give you the prices these stocks were at over a year ago, when you were tellin' everyone how crappy they were and purrrdictin' their deeestruction.
AAPL: 68.01
CHK: 30.70
COP: 62.30
GOOG: 409.00
HK: 14.17
NVDA: 25.34
Or, if these are too low for you, we can use my actual cost basis. Since actions is supposed to speak louder than wurdz, I guess that would be a better idea. In case you'd like to know my ACTUAL starting prices on each (ie. my real $$$ cost basis), I'll be happy to oblige:
AAPL: 91.15
CHK: 31.20
COP: 64.30
GOOG: 519.97
HK: 10.55
NVDA: 27.38
Whichever numbers you'd perfer to use is up to you. Either way, feel free to dig up this thread in another 12-18 months and we'll see whether I should'a listned to da Reaper.  |
Well, like me said in me last post. Yer numbas be incorreckt, my numbas be valid. Ifn ya gotsta come by and disclose how good da POS you mentioned are by saying you were long these pigs you get what you were so proud of. And yes...we'll check back offen...but you won't be here toutin ANY of these pigs in 18 mumphs.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| damon |
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Investing Sr. Associate

Joined: 04 May 2006
  Posts: 160 This Month: 0
4500.15 e$
Net worth: 43,025.15 Portfolio Value: 38,525.00 Monthly Return: -14.81% Trades this month: 0 Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
| Grimreaper wrote: | | vetelmo wrote: | | Fair? Grim?? lmao!! He still has not acknowledged that his opinion has been proven simply irrelavent. |
Well, he had his fax wrong since I chorted RIMM fer a GAHUGE gain on 1 occayzhun...plus several udder small gains, and I also said AAPL would take out 97.50 when it wassa at $80. I'm just takin his spewage o'da goowidge and puttin da numbas to it...He did say "Yeah...GOOG will drop $100 in a single day from the $700 level" Like me said bafo...summa ya's gots da guts ta admit dat you bees completely anna totally clueless. Udders gotsta have it prooveded to ya. All I'm doin is takin anudder clueless clown and puttin him through da Reaper smackdown. It ainna like he called DA BOTTOM on da housing mawket when TOL wassa at 29.50 er sumthin. It's actually werser than that! ...you gotta problum wit dat?  |
If you're gonna quote me, you might wanna make sure you get the your facts straight and you keep it in context.
On 06/05/2007, you said:
"I doubt GOOG gets through the 52 week high of 513. It is up through 509 in premawket trading. I'm ssssschtickin to my purrdixshun that GOOG will see a single 100 point down day when we see the first "real" mawket correxshun in about 2 years. GOOG will be fun to watch. I think it will be neet when you will actually be able to google da phrase..."stock market debacle".....anna chawt ov GOOG (da stock) will sho up!"
My reply, meant to rib you for your doom & gloom posts which often are lacking in specifics, was:
"Don't worry about it. My purrdixshun is that Grim's 100-point drop 2 years from now will be from $800 to $700 and GOOG will recover half of the loss the following day. "
Nowhere did I say GOOG will drop $100 in a single day from the $700 level. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| damon |
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Investing Sr. Associate

Joined: 04 May 2006
  Posts: 160 This Month: 0
4500.15 e$
Net worth: 43,025.15 Portfolio Value: 38,525.00 Monthly Return: -14.81% Trades this month: 0 Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
| Grimreaper wrote: | | damon wrote: | Grim,
You seem to have missed the point of my post. I'm not declaring any of these to be a screaming buy at today's levels. I'm just showin' folks how these stocks have performed in the 12-18 months since you were knockin' em. So to be "fair" to you, maybe I ought to give you the prices these stocks were at over a year ago, when you were tellin' everyone how crappy they were and purrrdictin' their deeestruction.
AAPL: 68.01
CHK: 30.70
COP: 62.30
GOOG: 409.00
HK: 14.17
NVDA: 25.34
Or, if these are too low for you, we can use my actual cost basis. Since actions is supposed to speak louder than wurdz, I guess that would be a better idea. In case you'd like to know my ACTUAL starting prices on each (ie. my real $$$ cost basis), I'll be happy to oblige:
AAPL: 91.15
CHK: 31.20
COP: 64.30
GOOG: 519.97
HK: 10.55
NVDA: 27.38
Whichever numbers you'd perfer to use is up to you. Either way, feel free to dig up this thread in another 12-18 months and we'll see whether I should'a listned to da Reaper.  |
Well, like me said in me last post. Yer numbas be incorreckt, my numbas be valid. Ifn ya gotsta come by and disclose how good da POS you mentioned are by saying you were long these pigs you get what you were so proud of. And yes...we'll check back offen...but you won't be here toutin ANY of these pigs in 18 mumphs.  |
You ought to spend less time making silly purrrdixions and more time on honing your reading comprehension skills. It'll be fun to revisit this thread in 18 months.....for me, that is.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| StatTrader |
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Member Of The Month! April

|
| You are correct Vetelmo, it does boil down to a lack of relevance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Grimreaper |
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
 CFO

|
| damon wrote: | | Grimreaper wrote: | | vetelmo wrote: | | Fair? Grim?? lmao!! He still has not acknowledged that his opinion has been proven simply irrelavent. |
Well, he had his fax wrong since I chorted RIMM fer a GAHUGE gain on 1 occayzhun...plus several udder small gains, and I also said AAPL would take out 97.50 when it wassa at $80. I'm just takin his spewage o'da goowidge and puttin da numbas to it...He did say "Yeah...GOOG will drop $100 in a single day from the $700 level" Like me said bafo...summa ya's gots da guts ta admit dat you bees completely anna totally clueless. Udders gotsta have it prooveded to ya. All I'm doin is takin anudder clueless clown and puttin him through da Reaper smackdown. It ainna like he called DA BOTTOM on da housing mawket when TOL wassa at 29.50 er sumthin. It's actually werser than that! ...you gotta problum wit dat?  |
If you're gonna quote me, you might wanna make sure you get the your facts straight and you keep it in context.
On 06/05/2007, you said:
"I doubt GOOG gets through the 52 week high of 513. It is up through 509 in premawket trading. I'm ssssschtickin to my purrdixshun that GOOG will see a single 100 point down day when we see the first "real" mawket correxshun in about 2 years. GOOG will be fun to watch. I think it will be neet when you will actually be able to google da phrase..."stock market debacle".....anna chawt ov GOOG (da stock) will sho up!"
My reply, meant to rib you for your doom & gloom posts which often are lacking in specifics, was:
"Don't worry about it. My purrdixshun is that Grim's 100-point drop 2 years from now will be from $800 to $700 and GOOG will recover half of the loss the following day. "
Nowhere did I say GOOG will drop $100 in a single day from the $700 level. |
Well, at least now yer being a bit fairer to me. Last time you tried to pin the entire move in RIMM as a chort n hold fer instunce....da fax is dat I even chorted RIMM on the day it had a key reversal day (which I also posted about at one o'da RIMM boards) and covered for at least 20%...and then I did not enter chort agin until this recent high. But I already mentioned dat I coverd it (as well as AAPL for 4%+) and will re-enter as soon as RIMM takes out the 52 week high agin. I will admit that I said I doubt GOOG gits through $513....plus I will admit dat I was holding chort at da time it didit (my GOOG trades can be viewed at Virtualstockexchange.com). I posted about my add yesterday. We'll just go with the fact dat you think GOOG sees $700-$800...which is obviously why you still think GOOG is a hold. I'm chort...yer still long...as ov right cheeya right now. And ya doesn't hasta splain why you think GOOG will NEVER drop 100 points in a day cause I know you don't baleave it will. I'm just trying to point out the way the terminally clueless think so da resto da natives kin see what I'm tawkin bout.....waaaay ahed o'time. Like wit da housing mawkets fer instunce....do you think anybudy saw things gettin as bad as they is now when I told em this wud happen waaaaay back in late summer 2006?
Sidenote: If GOOG was to drop 100 points in a single day bafo it got to $700+....which would be a more "likely" area for a 100 point drop to materialize from according to Damon....pleez, do not adjust your tv sets....it will be an ACTUAL emergency!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Grimreaper |
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
 CFO

|
| StatTrader wrote: | | You are correct Vetelmo, it does boil down to a lack of relevance. |
Lack ov relevence to fokes who think like you. But my take on thangs ainna lackin substance....I'm just "Miss Understood" Da lesson to da masses of 15 to 25 fokes who regularly visit this site is as follows When it is soooo obvious that Earl goes higher becuz of "werld growth n demand" that even a highly regarded technician/statistishun such as Stat ignores his own BS....BEWARE!...dat may be a bubble yer sportin! Earl goin higher cause it's obvious to ya...right, Stat? Well, it's obvious to the udder 25 fokes at this site too. In fackt...theyy ainna 1 person on da planet dat be mo neggy than me! Will you at least agree witme on that? Oh yeah Yer goin dooooooooooown.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| vetelmo |
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Moderator

|
| StatTrader wrote: | | You are correct Vetelmo, it does boil down to a lack of relevance. |
Yup! Thats the jist of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| damon |
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Investing Sr. Associate

Joined: 04 May 2006
  Posts: 160 This Month: 0
4500.15 e$
Net worth: 43,025.15 Portfolio Value: 38,525.00 Monthly Return: -14.81% Trades this month: 0 Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
Oil @ $72 and CVX lookin' to close at a new 52-week high. If being long on oil is wrong, then I doan wanna be right.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
| vetelmo |
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Moderator

|
No need for personal attacks Grim. Another post sent to the trash.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| vetelmo |
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Moderator

|
| Grim Knock it off............. Maybe you need to read JRW's PM to you again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Grimreaper |
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
 CFO

|
| vetelmo wrote: | | Grim Knock it off............. Maybe you need to read JRW's PM to you again. |
Relax..I made him an offer he should accept. Ifn he do you woan even hasta lissen to me no mo atall! Now tell me how saweet dat'd be!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| vetelmo |
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Moderator

|
| Wow, RIMM is going to go nutz now that they have approval in China. This stock is gonna need a bigger split, lol. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Grimreaper |
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
 CFO

|
Not sho what RIMM has to do wit Earl...but WMB sho does. I added to my WMB short at 33.40 (even though it comes back up to retest 33.50), I also added to FSLR, and as a bonus I added to RIMM at 217 limit to get these 3 positions to equal 60% of a $100000 funny muny fun n games portfolio. Plus I added to AAPL too! Maaaaan....tawk about a portfolio where ya kin just "set it n ferget it" till Oct!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|