Goto the eInvesting Home Page
Home    Investing Forums    Edit Your Profile    Manage Your Portfolio    View the Rankings    Learn about the Simulator

Welcome to eInvesting! You've found the coolest stock market game on the web. At eInvesting you compete for monthly cash prizes while you interact, make virtual dollars, purchase items, and trade in the realistic stock market simulator. We make investing FUN!

Join now and and start trading right away!
Log In to make this message disappear!

 
  ::  Register  ::  Log in  ::  Log in to check your private messages
Purchase e$ Purchase e$ Virtual Store Virtual Store FAQ  FAQ      Search Search  
 
 
www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » Stock Research Center

Peak Oil Links


Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Peak Oil Links « View previous topic :: View next topic »
Author Message
StatTrader
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 5:13 am Post subject: Peak Oil Links Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5385.83 e$

Net worth: 60,514.83
Portfolio Value: 55,129.00
Monthly Return:
-40.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

For those interested in the Peak Oil debate, I thought it would be nice to have a thread for sharing links to articles on both sides of the debate.

For those unfamiliar with Peak Oil, Peak Oil is not about the end of oil, it is about the end of our ability to increase the availability of oil. Almost everyone is in agreement that oil is a finite resource that will eventually be used up. In the process of using it up, production first increases, reaches a peak, then slowly decreases. Currently the world consumes about 86 million barrels of oil per day (mbpd) and produces slightly less than 85 mbpd. Some forecasts state that we have already seen the peak production, other forecasts state that peak will be at about 115 mbpd.

The "sides" of the Peak Oil debate aren't about whether Peak Oil will occur but are about when Peak Oil will occur. The current estimates range from 2005 to about 2030. One "side" argues that it is far enough away that we can take our time to start addressing the issue, the other "side" claims that it is on our doorstep so we need to act with urgency.

My hope is that any actual debate on this board take place on a separate thread from this one. Let's reserve this thread for links. This thread should be about sharing resources so that board members can educate themselves about the issue. Lets keep the arguing about who's right and who's wrong on a separate thread.

The links below are generally on the side of Peak Oil occurring sooner rather than later.

http://www.rte.ie/tv/futureshock/av_20070618.html

http://www.energybulletin.net/31138.html

http://www.odac-info.org/

http://www.theoildrum.com/

If you have personally read a book about Peak Oil that you would like to share, please mention the book here.
Back to top
Im Not Warren Buffett
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:15 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 26 Nov 2005

Posts: 3481
This Month: 3
Location: Boston
11569.22 e$

Net worth: 6,996,355.52
Portfolio Value: 14,627.30
Monthly Return:
-40.02%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

Tom/Stat,
I picked up a copy of "A Thousand Barrels a Second" by Peter Tertzakian. I've only gotten through the first 75 pages or so, and as such aren't really into the "good" parts yet... I'll give a more in-depth review/recommendation once I finish it sometime in the next week.

If you want some firepower for the "Peak Oil Now" crowd, I recommend reading up on Sakhalin I/II projects... or just watching a slideshow. The engineering feats Exxon needed to pull off to make that possible are exceptionally impressive. I believe the cover of either the 2004 or 2005 XOM Annual Report is one of the Sakhalin projects, but to really do it justice you need to see some of the diagrams and understand the climate...
Production costs wound up being something in the neighborhood of $35 billion if my memory isn't failing me. Original estimate? $15 billion or so.
Back to top
StatTrader
PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:17 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5385.83 e$

Net worth: 60,514.83
Portfolio Value: 55,129.00
Monthly Return:
-40.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

The following argues for $50-$55/barrel post-July time frame

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/commentary-oil-closer-top-bottom/story.aspx?guid=666EE788-E3FC-4C40-9F8A-1AAF6EC89C87&dist=SecMostMailed
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:30 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5941
This Month: 0

1007.15 e$

Net worth: 432,505.15
Portfolio Value: 279,798.00
Monthly Return:
-19.66%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

StatTrader wrote:
The following argues for $50-$55/barrel post-July time frame

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/commentary-oil-closer-top-bottom/story.aspx?guid=666EE788-E3FC-4C40-9F8A-1AAF6EC89C87&dist=SecMostMailed


Earl's makin nice progress towards $55 this moanin in da futures pits. Maybe you shud pray fo a him er herricane like da resto da Earl idots? Rolling Eyes But be careful ifn ya live in Lonk Island, N.Y. I'll be takin dat out this summer. Embarassed
Back to top
gnd0221186
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:51 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Associate
Investing Associate

Joined: 23 Jan 2007

Posts: 47
This Month: 0

198.44 e$

Net worth: 69,800.74
Portfolio Value: 69,602.30
Monthly Return:
-34.95%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

interesting viewpoint - but considering the article is based on technical analysis, i can't give it much credibility.
Back to top
StatTrader
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:30 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5385.83 e$

Net worth: 60,514.83
Portfolio Value: 55,129.00
Monthly Return:
-40.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Yet another, this time from Bloomberg

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601072&sid=aH6K3ZWkTOwY&refer=energy

Also, a very good book is "Twilight in the Desert" by Mathew Simmons. The first part of the book gives an overview of the history of the Saudi royal family and Saudi politics, the second part of the book explains oil geology, and the third section of the book discusses technical papers that Saudi engineers have submitted to technical oil conferences and what those papers suggest for the current state of Saudi oil fields.
Back to top
gnd0221186
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:03 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Associate
Investing Associate

Joined: 23 Jan 2007

Posts: 47
This Month: 0

198.44 e$

Net worth: 69,800.74
Portfolio Value: 69,602.30
Monthly Return:
-34.95%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

another interesting viewpoint. with oil prices surging and the housing markets struggling, id be interested to see how long the fed will keep rates unchanged.
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:51 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5941
This Month: 0

1007.15 e$

Net worth: 432,505.15
Portfolio Value: 279,798.00
Monthly Return:
-19.66%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

gnd0221186 wrote:
another interesting viewpoint. with oil prices surging and the housing markets struggling, id be interested to see how long the fed will keep rates unchanged.


Well...da fed can't raise rates becuz ifn it did GS would tank another 150 points in 1 day! Then ole Hank Paulson would storm into Dubya's office screeming Arrow "Hey! When I switched from being da biggest crook in the country to werkin fer you I was promused the rest ov my sheister buddies wouldn't get crushed!...not until Hillary gets elected and you go down as the werst president in the history of this country anyways" Laughing Da fed will be lowering rates as soon as da mawkets go through the repeat of Oct 1987. Bernanke will NOT act until there is a reazun to. And of course since uncle Ben stops by heeeeya to see what da Reaper gots in store he knows I'll be bringing commodititties down in a heap. Inflayshun be da biggest concern. But wit da Reaper werkin it like a rib...uncle Ben can sleep "OK" at night. Wink
Back to top
gnd0221186
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:31 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Associate
Investing Associate

Joined: 23 Jan 2007

Posts: 47
This Month: 0

198.44 e$

Net worth: 69,800.74
Portfolio Value: 69,602.30
Monthly Return:
-34.95%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

haha grim, don't be so optimistic.
Back to top
StatTrader
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:01 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5385.83 e$

Net worth: 60,514.83
Portfolio Value: 55,129.00
Monthly Return:
-40.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

This link is excellent but requires a high bandwidth connection. Please, lets put the discussions on a separate thread and maintain this thread for links and book reviews. (Grim, which words don't you understand?)

http://abc.net.au/4corners/special_eds/20060710/default_standard.htm
Back to top

StatTrader
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:35 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5385.83 e$

Net worth: 60,514.83
Portfolio Value: 55,129.00
Monthly Return:
-40.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

It looks as though the mainstream press is getting more and more interested in the subject

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_26/b4040074.htm?campaign_id=rss_magzn
Back to top
Im Not Warren Buffett
PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:58 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 26 Nov 2005

Posts: 3481
This Month: 3
Location: Boston
11569.22 e$

Net worth: 6,996,355.52
Portfolio Value: 14,627.30
Monthly Return:
-40.02%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

I just finished up the review of "A Thousand Barrels a Second".
Back to top
StatTrader
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:18 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5385.83 e$

Net worth: 60,514.83
Portfolio Value: 55,129.00
Monthly Return:
-40.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Interesting article stating that oil demand is determined more by GDP growth than price.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20070628-0714-oil-demand.html
Back to top
Im Not Warren Buffett
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 1:19 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 26 Nov 2005

Posts: 3481
This Month: 3
Location: Boston
11569.22 e$

Net worth: 6,996,355.52
Portfolio Value: 14,627.30
Monthly Return:
-40.02%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

StatTrader wrote:
Interesting article stating that oil demand is determined more by GDP growth than price.


In the book I just read, there were alot of charts showing - I forget the exact name used - something along the lines of "economic oil dependency," which represents what each 1% growth in GDP translates to in terms of increased oil usage. For a rapidly industrializing like China, the correlation is about 1, for the US the correlation is around .6, and I believe South Korea was mentioned as one of the lower users with a ratio around .25 or so...

Also, another interesting article from Seeking Alpha that doesn't directly relate to Peak Oil, but rather to the potential for current mispricings in drilling stocks due to the view that high oil prices are just cyclical... http://energy.seekingalpha.com/article/39549
Back to top
StatTrader
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:22 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5385.83 e$

Net worth: 60,514.83
Portfolio Value: 55,129.00
Monthly Return:
-40.67%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Not Warren,

Interesting link on the drillers. Personally I suspect that the semi-submersible rig builders and operators may see higher demand than the land-based drillers.

An issue related to the price of oil is our trade deficit. A large portion of our deficit results directly from oil. Here is an analysis of the effects of the trade deficit and other debts held by the US.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/06/25/cncredit125.xml&ref=patrick.net
Back to top
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next Page 1 of 4

www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » Stock Research Center » Peak Oil Links
Jump to:  




Penny Stock Simulator | What are e$? | Forum Rules | FAQ | Manage Your eInvesting Portfolio | Privacy Policy | Links
PcTechTalk | Club-tC | Lost Discussion | World Class Designs | Xtreme Tuning | Statistical Trading | Advertise with eInvesting!


Before acting on any advice or program you find here at eInvesting.com we strongly recommend that you seek independent & professional legal, tax and investment advice as to whether it is suitable for your particular needs and circumstances. Failure to seek personally tailored, detailed, professional advice prior to acting could lead you to act contrary to your own best interests and could lead to loss of money. eInvesting.com is not responsible for your actions, so do it right!

Powered by:phpBB VERSION 59
© 2005, 2006 eInvesting.com