Goto the eInvesting Home Page
Home    Investing Forums    Edit Your Profile    Manage Your Portfolio    View the Rankings    Learn about the Simulator

Welcome to eInvesting! You've found the coolest stock market game on the web. At eInvesting you compete for monthly cash prizes while you interact, make virtual dollars, purchase items, and trade in the realistic stock market simulator. We make investing FUN!

Join now and and start trading right away!
Log In to make this message disappear!

 
  ::  Register  ::  Log in  ::  Log in to check your private messages
Purchase e$ Purchase e$ Virtual Store Virtual Store FAQ  FAQ      Search Search  
 
 
www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » The Stock Market

New Trend For Gold?


Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15  Next
New Trend For Gold? « View previous topic :: View next topic »
Author Message
gugaplex
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:58 am Post subject: New Trend For Gold? Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 572
This Month: 0
Location: USA
12333.66 e$

Net worth: 142,562.66
Portfolio Value: 130,229.00
Monthly Return:
-24.46%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

It's starting to look more and more evident that gold's peaking at $720/oz will be a long-term high. I believe that gold is going down considerably over the next few years. There will be "dead-cat" bonces along the way, but the true trend will likely take gold sub $500....
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:21 pm Post subject: Re: New Trend For Gold? Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5940
This Month: 0

92581.91 e$

Net worth: 472,811.91
Portfolio Value: 228,530.00
Monthly Return:
-28.27%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

gugaplex wrote:
It's starting to look more and more evident that gold's peaking at $720/oz will be a long-term high. I believe that gold is going down considerably over the next few years. There will be "dead-cat" bonces along the way, but the true trend will likely take gold sub $500....


What may really sooprise da goldbugs is the fact that the precious metal pig stocks barely budged today if you look at the ratio I gave everyone to guage value...HUI/POG. The HUI stock index and the price of physical gold both fell a tremendous amount for a single day move. But the ratio still stayed at grossly overvalued 51%....only a 1% change from yesterday. Anything above 50% is grossly overvalued. Anything above 55% is territory where you can expect a buy call from Cramer. Laughing Long term buy zone? 33% or lower. Wink
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:53 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5940
This Month: 0

92581.91 e$

Net worth: 472,811.91
Portfolio Value: 228,530.00
Monthly Return:
-28.27%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Even after yesterday's debacle the HUI/POG ratio still stands at an extremely overvalued 50%+ level. If there are any goldbugs here you guys had better start thinking about reworking yer plan. That means you either hold steady on the price of the stocks in the HUI index whilst you rally the price of physical gold OR....hold the price of gold steady whilst you dump your gold pig stocks. Laughing Not sure yuns guys like either option but so far yuns look like a bunch of idiots piss'n into a gale force wind! Freakin goldbugs, I never could figure those clowns out. Maybe we should just douse em wit a large quantity of industrial strength Raid bug killer. Laughing Just jokin goldbugs, I actually luv you guys cause you are sooooo very clueless. Did you ever hear of a guy named Jim Cramer? Very Happy
Back to top
StatTrader
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:14 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5318.41 e$

Net worth: 89,418.41
Portfolio Value: 84,100.00
Monthly Return:
-41.10%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I would not be quick to call $720 the high in gold given the US Current Account deficit. Gold may very well be peaking as valued against a basket of currencies but to call $720 the high assumes that the dollar will not weaken substantially of the next few years due to the HUGE trade deficits that we have. That is one assumption that is dangerous to draw and should be backed up by more than just wishful thinking.
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:26 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5940
This Month: 0

92581.91 e$

Net worth: 472,811.91
Portfolio Value: 228,530.00
Monthly Return:
-28.27%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

StatTrader wrote:
I would not be quick to call $720 the high in gold given the US Current Account deficit. Gold may very well be peaking as valued against a basket of currencies but to call $720 the high assumes that the dollar will not weaken substantially of the next few years due to the HUGE trade deficits that we have. That is one assumption that is dangerous to draw and should be backed up by more than just wishful thinking.


It isn't wishful thinkin Stat. It's valid chawt analysis...plus the ratio I gave you has never failed either. Like me said, you can go back to 2001 and use the ratio to see where it was just after 9/11 and you will begin to see why there was this bull run. The ratio at that time was at 20% but nobody wanted to buy gold or gold stocks because they were dead money....just like MSFT is right now for instance. BTW, MSFT will one day rule the world and everbudy will one day be wondering why they were all so hyped up about GOOG! I think you will begin to see dat manifest itself with GOOG on Mon although MSFT still needs to capitulate. Gettin back to da goldies. Of all da gold stocks I follow there are only 3 that I know of that left nonconfirmed price of trend highs during this last speculative bubble run. Those 3 are MNG, NXG, and RGLD. All the rest left no reason why they should EVER see these highs again...including the HUI index itself....sorry. Sad But your argument is in fact what makes a mawket. Like me also said bafo.....sum will win.....sum will lose. I'm just tryin ta keep fokes on da right side o'da mawkets cause like my mission statement says, "I'm not here to make friends, I'm here to save you muuuneee! Wink Very Happy
Back to top
gugaplex
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 7:02 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 572
This Month: 0
Location: USA
12333.66 e$

Net worth: 142,562.66
Portfolio Value: 130,229.00
Monthly Return:
-24.46%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Take a look at the ten-year chart for gold. It resembles NASDAQ 2000. There may be some further upside, but if you feel comfortable with that risk/reward scenario you might as well just go to Vegas and play the slot machines.
[/img]
Back to top
jwelch999
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:35 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Associate
Investing Associate

Joined: 06 Jul 2006

Posts: 44
This Month: 0

2314.56 e$

Net worth: 22,548.26
Portfolio Value: 20,233.70
Monthly Return:
23.63%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Nasdaq in 2000... That is quite foreshadowing... glad I exited the yellow stuff earlier... might miss a continued speculation, but grim and guga are right on this one... It will get ugly at some point...

J
Back to top
StatTrader
PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 4:08 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5318.41 e$

Net worth: 89,418.41
Portfolio Value: 84,100.00
Monthly Return:
-41.10%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Grim,

Your argument assumes that the dollar will NOT drop substantially against a basket of currencies over the next few years yet you have not stated anything to back that up.

My statement is that against currencies such as the yuan and euro gold may very well be at a long term high. But if the dollar drops substantially then gold may not be at a high as measured against the dollar.

As stated in my post, please back up that assumption with something more than wishful thinking.
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:42 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5940
This Month: 0

92581.91 e$

Net worth: 472,811.91
Portfolio Value: 228,530.00
Monthly Return:
-28.27%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

StatTrader wrote:
Grim,

Your argument assumes that the dollar will NOT drop substantially against a basket of currencies over the next few years yet you have not stated anything to back that up.

My statement is that against currencies such as the yuan and euro gold may very well be at a long term high. But if the dollar drops substantially then gold may not be at a high as measured against the dollar.

As stated in my post, please back up that assumption with something more than wishful thinking.


Even though inflation is s'posed ta be a decrease in demand fo da dallah I'm not at all convinced that things go the way they's "s'posed" to in the fast paced werld afta 9/11. There were lots of things that was s'posed to happen based on what is normal but what we ended up with was a bunch of "conundrums" Very Happy Even Alan Greenwad da former fed chairman was confounded by them. The first wave up in gold which began in late 2001 was not because of inflationary pressures IMO. And I think this second wave up off the sub 200 HUI low was nothing more than da playas riding the crest o'da wave o'the "obvious" to sucker in all of da bagholders. We won't have to worry about inflation for at least a few years as the wave of much lower commodity prices are just about to begin. Like I said many many times bafo....if ya want da truth about any sector of the economy....simply look to da stock mawket. If you want da truth about da stock mawket....loook to da chawts. If you can't recognize what the price of the energy, precious metal, and industrial metal stocks were saying even as the price of the commodities were making higher highs there there are 2 things you can do. Either wait for the stock prices to catch up to commodity prices like the anal-ysts CNBC parades on screen all day long are saying's gonna happen. Or wait for it to become more obvious. I already know EXACTLY wassa gonna happen though. Trust me, you'll like doing things my way cause it'll cost you 30% less to fill up yer car wit petrol benzine! Wink Very Happy What the future is saying past 2 years from now remains to be seen. As of right now the energy stocks, the commodity stocks, the precious metal stocks are on their way to new 52 week lows.
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:46 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5940
This Month: 0

92581.91 e$

Net worth: 472,811.91
Portfolio Value: 228,530.00
Monthly Return:
-28.27%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

HUI/POG ratio moved back above 51% again today. See dat, I told ya those goldbugs were a stoopid bunch....they can't even pay attention! Laughing Lemme splain it again golden idiots....if you sell yer physical gold like you did today AND you buy the stocks....it means the ratio moves farther into overbought territory...got it duma$$es? Rolling Eyes Jeeesh, these goldbugs are thicker then a brick....maybe I should jist dust em right now and put em outta their misery. Razz I do like da way the oil pig stocks are willing to deliver da bag o'goods to da bagholders going into earnuns week fer da oil pig stocks. Still waitin fo TXU to get above $62.00. Came close today and I will add it as a new personal chort using the $55 strike far enough out to get dat warm n comfy feeling where the cost is not to dear ta play. I think the goldbugs will come to their senses a tad earlier than the energy pig playas....probably as a matter of necessity rather than choice though. Like me said, da goldbugs are an extremely stoopid bunch. Very Happy
Back to top

gugaplex
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:54 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 572
This Month: 0
Location: USA
12333.66 e$

Net worth: 142,562.66
Portfolio Value: 130,229.00
Monthly Return:
-24.46%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

If I were to short either gold or oil, I would rather short gold because it is not as big a necessity to everyday life as oil is. I think both are way over-valued. You are right about how the gold bulls are realizing their mistakes before the oil bulls, just look at how gold has come well off its peak and oil is still hovering near it.
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:05 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5940
This Month: 0

92581.91 e$

Net worth: 472,811.91
Portfolio Value: 228,530.00
Monthly Return:
-28.27%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

gugaplex wrote:
If I were to short either gold or oil, I would rather short gold because it is not as big a necessity to everyday life as oil is. I think both are way over-valued. You are right about how the gold bulls are realizing their mistakes before the oil bulls, just look at how gold has come well off its peak and oil is still hovering near it.


Logically speaking, gold should lead oil lower since gold is more of an inflation play. I think we will see gold head lower before oil does but I would give gold an outside shot at hitting $670 first. Right now the gold stocks are on their last run so they will turn before anything else. Then the energy pig stocks will begin selling off after the great earnings reports. Wink
Back to top
StatTrader
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:24 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Member Of The Month! April
Member Of The Month! April

Joined: 08 Sep 2005

Posts: 407
This Month: 0

5318.41 e$

Net worth: 89,418.41
Portfolio Value: 84,100.00
Monthly Return:
-41.10%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I'm still holding my CVX position. Got in at the $57-$58 level and see no reason to jump ship yet. Production capacity and demand are very delicately balanced right now. Until that situtaion changes I don't see much downside in oil. And no, I'm not referring to inventory, I said production capacity! Two different things.
Back to top
Grimreaper
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:33 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 11 Jun 2005

Posts: 5940
This Month: 0

92581.91 e$

Net worth: 472,811.91
Portfolio Value: 228,530.00
Monthly Return:
-28.27%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

StatTrader wrote:
I'm still holding my CVX position. Got in at the $57-$58 level and see no reason to jump ship yet. Production capacity and demand are very delicately balanced right now. Until that situtaion changes I don't see much downside in oil. And no, I'm not referring to inventory, I said production capacity! Two different things.


To me it looks like the next few days falls into "no safe haven" category. Very Happy Here's a good long though...$VIX.X. Wink
Back to top
blackfoxtrade
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:55 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Associate
Associate

Joined: 24 May 2005

Posts: 338
This Month: 0
Location: Estonia
11375.71 e$

Net worth: 50,121.61
Portfolio Value: 38,745.90
Monthly Return:
-32.37%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

An article by Kiyosaki at Yahoo! Finance today. Here!
Back to top
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15  Next Page 1 of 15

www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » The Stock Market » New Trend For Gold?
Jump to:  




Penny Stock Simulator | What are e$? | Forum Rules | FAQ | Manage Your eInvesting Portfolio | Privacy Policy | Links
PcTechTalk | Club-tC | Lost Discussion | World Class Designs | Xtreme Tuning | Statistical Trading | Advertise with eInvesting!


Before acting on any advice or program you find here at eInvesting.com we strongly recommend that you seek independent & professional legal, tax and investment advice as to whether it is suitable for your particular needs and circumstances. Failure to seek personally tailored, detailed, professional advice prior to acting could lead you to act contrary to your own best interests and could lead to loss of money. eInvesting.com is not responsible for your actions, so do it right!

Powered by:phpBB VERSION 59
© 2005, 2006 eInvesting.com