Goto the eInvesting Home Page
Home    Investing Forums    Edit Your Profile    Manage Your Portfolio    View the Rankings    Learn about the Simulator

Welcome to eInvesting! You've found the coolest stock market game on the web. At eInvesting you compete for monthly cash prizes while you interact, make virtual dollars, purchase items, and trade in the realistic stock market simulator. We make investing FUN!

Join now and and start trading right away!
Log In to make this message disappear!

 
  ::  Register  ::  Log in  ::  Log in to check your private messages
Purchase e$ Purchase e$ Virtual Store Virtual Store FAQ  FAQ      Search Search  
 
 
www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » The eInvesting Stock Market Game Trading Simulator

Why no "."


Post new topic Reply to topic
Why no "." « View previous topic :: View next topic »
Author Message
nickspcs
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:07 pm Post subject: Why no "." Reply with quote

Investing Sr. Associate
Investing Sr. Associate

Joined: 08 Mar 2006

Posts: 52
This Month: 0

14371.59 e$

Net worth: 1,146,791.15
Portfolio Value: 2,274.56
Monthly Return:
19.19%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

My father works for a company with the "." and I would like to invest in it. I was just curious why you can not trade it on this site. Thank You. Any information is useful!
Back to top
Benjamin
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:25 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Administrator
Administrator

Joined: 30 Jan 2005

Posts: 2707
This Month: 10
Location: Chicago
32961.70 e$

Net worth: 153,136.70
Portfolio Value: 120,160.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

We ran into a lot of problems with them changing symbols too often.

I dunno, maybe we can allow .'s as long as they are over a certain price.
Back to top
nelaina
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:28 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 17 Nov 2005

Posts: 2081
This Month: 0
Location: new jersey
350421.56 e$

Net worth: 1,976,026.56
Portfolio Value: 117,273.00
Monthly Return:
33.51%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Benjamin wrote:


I dunno, maybe we can allow .'s as long as they are over a certain price.


Very Happy

that would be nice Very Happy
Back to top
vetelmo
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:56 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 21 Sep 2005

Posts: 4013
This Month: 21
Location: California
13316196.18 e$

Net worth: 47,330,398.18
Portfolio Value: 12,138,000.00
Monthly Return:
71.41%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I thought there other reasons as well. Like the uncertainty of these companies, considering they get "de-Listed". I know there were many other good reasons.
Back to top
Dave Rathbun
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:15 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 10 Apr 2005

Posts: 3388
This Month: 1
Location: Texas
407995.34 e$

Net worth: 1,277,440.34
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Removing the "dot" was a cheap and easy way to eliminate penny stocks. But at the same time we also put in place a limit to prevent stocks trading under $2 a share. It also prevents people from trading options, which (on Yahoo) always end with ".X". Options trading will be coming back, once we get the system configured correctly. Some of those changes were put in place in the last round of updates.

Anybody have an invalid symbol in their portfolio? Wink It doesn't lock you out anymore.

Anyway, the rules can be altered, it's up to Benjamin.
Back to top
Benjamin
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:37 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Administrator
Administrator

Joined: 30 Jan 2005

Posts: 2707
This Month: 10
Location: Chicago
32961.70 e$

Net worth: 153,136.70
Portfolio Value: 120,160.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

We could try it next month perhaps and see how many symbols we have to change. I'm up for it.
Back to top
vetelmo
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:13 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 21 Sep 2005

Posts: 4013
This Month: 21
Location: California
13316196.18 e$

Net worth: 47,330,398.18
Portfolio Value: 12,138,000.00
Monthly Return:
71.41%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

This will be very interesting! Cyclops
Back to top
The Jersey Devil
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:59 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 20 Mar 2006

Posts: 251
This Month: 0
Location: Sewell, NJ
64329.77 e$

Net worth: 85,936.77
Portfolio Value: 21,607.00
Monthly Return:
38.15%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I wish we could trade dot stocks - then I could buy some commodities that made my dad some money back in the day, and I could jump on corn while the young ethanol industry builds up. The new high demand from the US government to use ethanol fuels and get us "less addicted to oil" as Bush said today in his first speech should be enough to get the industry on track IMO.
Back to top
vetelmo
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:18 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 21 Sep 2005

Posts: 4013
This Month: 21
Location: California
13316196.18 e$

Net worth: 47,330,398.18
Portfolio Value: 12,138,000.00
Monthly Return:
71.41%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Every single president since the 60's has been say the same thing, what would make people think any different because Bush says the same boring B.S. about oil and our depedency for it.
Back to top
The Jersey Devil
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:29 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 20 Mar 2006

Posts: 251
This Month: 0
Location: Sewell, NJ
64329.77 e$

Net worth: 85,936.77
Portfolio Value: 21,607.00
Monthly Return:
38.15%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Iono, maybe because there are actually car companies mass producing vehicles that take the E-85 ethanol fuel now, Congress said something about doubling our use of it by 2012, and it's really better than oil overall.

Ethanol (CH3CH2OH)
Ethanol is a liquid fuel that derives from plant matter. It is a sustainable resource that can be produced domestically and can be replenished indefinitely. The blending of ethanol with gasoline, or its use in place of gasoline or diesel fuel, supports the U.S. economy and contributes to energy independence. Vehicles running on blends of ethanol and gasoline, using ethanol as an oxygenate, produce significantly fewer harmful emissions than vehicles burning gasoline. Unlike petroleum-based fuels, ethanol produces no net carbon dioxide emissions.

More info on ethanol is available at the Renewable Fuels Association website: http://www.ethanolrfa.org/

Who knows? I'm new to the game and I'm probably wrong, but don't chastise me for having an opinion.
Back to top

Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » The eInvesting Stock Market Game Trading Simulator » Why no "."
Jump to:  




Penny Stock Simulator | What are e$? | Forum Rules | FAQ | Manage Your eInvesting Portfolio | Privacy Policy | Links
PcTechTalk | Club-tC | Lost Discussion | World Class Designs | Xtreme Tuning | Statistical Trading | Advertise with eInvesting!


Before acting on any advice or program you find here at eInvesting.com we strongly recommend that you seek independent & professional legal, tax and investment advice as to whether it is suitable for your particular needs and circumstances. Failure to seek personally tailored, detailed, professional advice prior to acting could lead you to act contrary to your own best interests and could lead to loss of money. eInvesting.com is not responsible for your actions, so do it right!

Powered by:phpBB VERSION 59
© 2005, 2006 eInvesting.com