Goto the eInvesting Home Page
Home    Investing Forums    Edit Your Profile    Manage Your Portfolio    View the Rankings    Learn about the Simulator

Welcome to eInvesting! You've found the coolest stock market game on the web. At eInvesting you compete for monthly cash prizes while you interact, make virtual dollars, purchase items, and trade in the realistic stock market simulator. We make investing FUN!

Join now and and start trading right away!
Log In to make this message disappear!

 
  ::  Register  ::  Log in  ::  Log in to check your private messages
Purchase e$ Purchase e$ Virtual Store Virtual Store FAQ  FAQ      Search Search  
 
 
www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » The Stock Market

solar panel / alt energy


Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 27, 28, 29  Next
solar panel / alt energy « View previous topic :: View next topic »
Author Message
Im Not Warren Buffett
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:16 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 26 Nov 2005

Posts: 3481
This Month: 8
Location: Boston
10566.92 e$

Net worth: 6,291,688.02
Portfolio Value: 32,916.10
Monthly Return:
5.41%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

frusnak wrote:
Very Happy As you all know I am a big fan of fuel cell technology and other alternative power sources to help break the strangle hold that big oil has on this country.
How ever except for coal to gas and solar these alternates are considered to be in the developemental stage. It will take another big crunch to get the market focusing on all of the choices we have versus oil. Very Happy


You have Lee Raymond, the departing head of Exxon Mobil (XOM) to thank for that. He vigorously fought efforts to fund research into alternate fuels, and attacked fellow oil companies that did. Say what you want, he defended his shareholders...
Back to top
frusnak
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:56 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 01 Nov 2005

Posts: 3369
This Month: 8
Location: jax.fla transplanted from cleveland,oh.
1890664.00 e$

Net worth: 2,329,604.00
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

Good info warren. BP and Shell are going forward though with their developement of hydrgen fueling station and related supports. This is the kind of thinking and actions by a big business that will keep them leaders in energy.
Back to top
stockmarkettips
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 2:47 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 30 Nov 2005

Posts: 712
This Month: 2
Location: California
944585.48 e$

Net worth: 1,238,024.48
Portfolio Value: 240,439.00
Monthly Return:
15.15%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Cramer spoke positively about Solar Power again today on Mad Money. SPWR and DSTI both benefited in after hours trading.
Back to top
frusnak
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:09 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 01 Nov 2005

Posts: 3369
This Month: 8
Location: jax.fla transplanted from cleveland,oh.
1890664.00 e$

Net worth: 2,329,604.00
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

Cramer cautioned about them and ESLR as being high in price. Recommended CA:ATA for a solar play.
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.asp?Feed=MCIntl&Date=20060103&ID=5388711&Symbol=CA:ATA
check this link Wink
Back to top
stockmarkettips
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:26 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 30 Nov 2005

Posts: 712
This Month: 2
Location: California
944585.48 e$

Net worth: 1,238,024.48
Portfolio Value: 240,439.00
Monthly Return:
15.15%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

He said that when the CPUC votes on Thursday it's likely to be in favor of a huge committment to solar power. In any case, DSTI and SPWR are rallying on this speculation.
Back to top
Dave Rathbun
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:10 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 10 Apr 2005

Posts: 3690
This Month: 0
Location: Texas
395427.20 e$

Net worth: 537,455.20
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Comments on this subject from the Dow Jones Newswire:
Quote:
(Dow Jones) ATS Automation (ATA.T) recently up 4.9% to C$17.04 in Toronto courtesy of Jim Cramer, analysts says. On his Mad Money TV show last night, Cramer called ATS his stealth solar-power play," analysts say, noting that ATS announced last week it hired a financial advisor to assess strategic alternatives for its Solar Group, including a public offering. The irascible Cramer also said to have indicated the solar-power industry is poised to benefit from a recently unveiled, massive solar-power-rebate program in California. Cramer's bullish solar-power outlook may also be benefiting Evergreen Solar (ESLR) and Daystar (DSTI). ESLR up 11% to $12.24; DSTI up 10% to $10.58.
Back to top
frusnak
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:12 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 01 Nov 2005

Posts: 3369
This Month: 8
Location: jax.fla transplanted from cleveland,oh.
1890664.00 e$

Net worth: 2,329,604.00
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

I think solar power will be the power play this year vs oil and gas.
Back to top
Dave Rathbun
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:30 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 10 Apr 2005

Posts: 3690
This Month: 0
Location: Texas
395427.20 e$

Net worth: 537,455.20
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I believe that "consumer" solar is still in the "early adopter" stage. It's hard to pick winners, as there are so many companies that will fizzle. But if you get the right one, you can look for amazing returns over the next ten years as the technology goes mainstream.

There's a chart around somewhere (can't find a decent one to link to at the moment) that shows how long technologies take to go "mainstream". It used to be that it took 10 years for a technology to be developed, during which time it was used by less than 10% of the population. Think of things like electricity, radio, televisions, VCR's, things like that. Then for the next 10 years you capture a cumulative 90% of the market. So you take 10 years to get started, then in 10 years more you get another 80% (10 + 80 = 90% quoted earlier). You may never get 100% penetration. (Someone once told me that WD-40 is found in over 98% of all homes in America... I find that astounding, if true.)

Now that curve has become flatter for more modern technologies. Think how fast audio cd's replaced vinyl records. Think how fast DVD's came on. It wasn't ten years, that's for sure.

So if that's true, then we're on the early curve for solar, at least as far as mass-produced "consumer" technology. If you find the right play, it could be worth a fortune. Cool
Back to top
frusnak
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 01 Nov 2005

Posts: 3369
This Month: 8
Location: jax.fla transplanted from cleveland,oh.
1890664.00 e$

Net worth: 2,329,604.00
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

Dave,
If you do a search on google with solar power you will find quit a few residential solar power providers, its costly right now but the prices will come down as demand/production increases. Batteries are a play on solar power also because they are a vital part of the systems. Very Happy
Back to top
stockmarkettips
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:29 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 30 Nov 2005

Posts: 712
This Month: 2
Location: California
944585.48 e$

Net worth: 1,238,024.48
Portfolio Value: 240,439.00
Monthly Return:
15.15%
Trades this month: 1
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Batteries are only involved with off-grid solar power systems while most of the business will be in grid tied systems.
Back to top

frusnak
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:35 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 01 Nov 2005

Posts: 3369
This Month: 8
Location: jax.fla transplanted from cleveland,oh.
1890664.00 e$

Net worth: 2,329,604.00
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

Good observation, if you want to have to purchase electricity when there is not enough sun hours to sell back enough to the grid, you won't need batteries.
Back to top
Dave Rathbun
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:45 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 10 Apr 2005

Posts: 3690
This Month: 0
Location: Texas
395427.20 e$

Net worth: 537,455.20
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

frusnak wrote:
If you do a search on google with solar power you will find quit a few residential solar power providers, its costly right now but the prices will come down as demand/production increases.

That's exactly my point... the "adoption curve" of new technology is in play here. I'll try to find a good article (with pictures, of course) that explains what I'm talking about.

Initial adopters always pay the price for being on the leading edge. As the technology becomes comoditized (if that's a word) then more and more people get on board until it becomes ubiquitous.

Look at the stock price curve for Dell and Microsoft. Starting from 1980 (very first computers) to 1990 (main stream) to 2000 (commodity). It's clear where you want to be an investor. The trick is to find the next "Dell" and not the next Altair. Cool
Back to top
frusnak
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:51 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 01 Nov 2005

Posts: 3369
This Month: 8
Location: jax.fla transplanted from cleveland,oh.
1890664.00 e$

Net worth: 2,329,604.00
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

Very Happy Altair, I was watching that nanotechnology company but did not buy. It did have a + 250% stock price increase though. It is down now@$2.40's started tracking it when it was under a $1.00 Confused
Back to top
Dave Rathbun
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:02 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 10 Apr 2005

Posts: 3690
This Month: 0
Location: Texas
395427.20 e$

Net worth: 537,455.20
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

frusnak wrote:
Very Happy Altair, I was watching that nanotechnology company but did not buy.

Wrong Altair. Laughing
Back to top
frusnak
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:08 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 01 Nov 2005

Posts: 3369
This Month: 8
Location: jax.fla transplanted from cleveland,oh.
1890664.00 e$

Net worth: 2,329,604.00
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items
more...

Shocked oops!
http://www.altairnano.com/
Thought you were talking about these folks.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 27, 28, 29  Next Page 3 of 29

www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » The Stock Market » solar panel / alt energy
Jump to:  




Penny Stock Simulator | What are e$? | Forum Rules | FAQ | Manage Your eInvesting Portfolio | Privacy Policy | Links
PcTechTalk | Club-tC | Lost Discussion | World Class Designs | Xtreme Tuning | Statistical Trading | Advertise with eInvesting!


Before acting on any advice or program you find here at eInvesting.com we strongly recommend that you seek independent & professional legal, tax and investment advice as to whether it is suitable for your particular needs and circumstances. Failure to seek personally tailored, detailed, professional advice prior to acting could lead you to act contrary to your own best interests and could lead to loss of money. eInvesting.com is not responsible for your actions, so do it right!

Powered by:phpBB VERSION 59
© 2005, 2006 eInvesting.com