| Author |
Message
|
| esquire415 |
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:03 pm Post subject: NAT & FRO |
|
|
 Investing Manager

Joined: 02 Jun 2006
  Posts: 321 This Month: 0
117313.53 e$
Net worth: 117,313.53 Portfolio Value: 0.00 Monthly Return: 0.00% Trades this month: 0 Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
What do you guys think of these tankers (no pun intended). They seem to be doing well despite the crappy market. I've been watchinig them since June and all they did is go up. Plus they give up high dividend yields. I regret not going in then.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Dystopian_Daydreamer |
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Associate

Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 17 This Month: 0
467.64 e$
Net worth: 467.64 Portfolio Value: 0.00 Monthly Return: 0.00% Trades this month: 0 Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
| NM and TRMD is where I would put my money in the tanker world. A year ago I would have told you SFL, which continues to be a good by, but I think that NM and TRMD are better this year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Apathetik |
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Associate

Joined: 27 Dec 2007 Posts: 46 This Month: 0
155.96 e$
Net worth: 41,825.46 Portfolio Value: 35,463.50 Monthly Return: -10.09% Trades this month: 0 Churn Rate: 0.00%Items  |
| They have annual cyclic ups and downs that make them much better to buy at their annual trough and sell at thier annual peak, they have nifty div payouts though that make them good long term buys, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Dystopian_Daydreamer |
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Investing Associate

Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 17 This Month: 0
467.64 e$
Net worth: 467.64 Portfolio Value: 0.00 Monthly Return: 0.00% Trades this month: 0 Churn Rate: 0.00%Items
|
| You can play the cyclics if you want, but that is just too much work for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|