Goto the eInvesting Home Page
Home    Investing Forums    Edit Your Profile    Manage Your Portfolio    View the Rankings    Learn about the Simulator

Welcome to eInvesting! You've found the coolest stock market game on the web. At eInvesting you compete for monthly cash prizes while you interact, make virtual dollars, purchase items, and trade in the realistic stock market simulator. We make investing FUN!

Join now and and start trading right away!
Log In to make this message disappear!

 
  ::  Register  ::  Log in  ::  Log in to check your private messages
Purchase e$ Purchase e$ Virtual Store Virtual Store FAQ  FAQ      Search Search  
 
 
www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » eInvesting Feedback

A call for diversity and trade price change.


Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
A call for diversity and trade price change. « View previous topic :: View next topic »
Do you think this would make a better competition?
yes
56%
 56%  [ 13 ]
no
43%
 43%  [ 10 ]
Total Votes : 23
Author Message
geb9696
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing VP
Investing VP

Joined: 10 Nov 2005

Posts: 1550
This Month: 0

14991.43 e$

Net worth: 535,362.43
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I seem to think it should be like in real life. You should let people do whatever the heck they want to. If i want to put my entire life savings on rimm options who should be allowed to stop me. Its my loss if they dont finish in the money and I lose everything. You complain it is lucky to pick one stock and skill to pick 5 but I disagree. I know right now I only feel confident to own one stock. Why should I be forced to buy 4 others just for the sake of holding 5 stocks? Its my risk for not diversifiying.
Back to top
nelaina
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 3:08 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 17 Nov 2005

Posts: 2128
This Month: 0
Location: new jersey
347419.41 e$

Net worth: 1,137,735.41
Portfolio Value: 131,148.00
Monthly Return:
-2.96%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

geb9696 wrote:
I seem to think it should be like in real life. You should let people do whatever the heck they want to. If i want to put my entire life savings on rimm options who should be allowed to stop me. Its my loss if they dont finish in the money and I lose everything. You complain it is lucky to pick one stock and skill to pick 5 but I disagree. I know right now I only feel confident to own one stock. Why should I be forced to buy 4 others just for the sake of holding 5 stocks? Its my risk for not diversifiying.


i definitley see your point geb, in real life i would agree with you on that. However, here we are competing on a monthly basis, and i definitely feel there is more skill involved with picking five stocks. One lucky stock can make a nice run. And one unlucky stock can sink your portfolio, but 5 well chosen stocks can create a nice balance that will keep your portfolio from sinking, and help you maintain your status in the competiton. I think that having it as a minimum of 5 is fair and helps both sides. Its the only way to truly be competing
Back to top
Dave Rathbun
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:11 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 10 Apr 2005

Posts: 3684
This Month: 39
Location: Texas
393682.13 e$

Net worth: 528,570.13
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I'm going on record as being against any minimum holding requirement. If you want to hold a single stock, you should be allowed to do so. If you want to hold 20 stocks, you should be allowed to do so. I think the primary reason behind the request is the fact that the current % calculation method penalizes active traders. It doesn't matter if you buy and hold one stock or buy and hold 5 or more stocks, it's the buy-and-hold that is the key.

When the new calculations are put in place, and the % return is built off of net returns based on your starting monthly capital, then I think the whole objection goes away. If you start with $1000, make 10 trades and make $100 on each of them, you've doubled your money. I don't see very many single stocks going up 100% in a month. At that point it will be up to the individual trading strategy... if you can make a lot of small gains on a lot of small trades you will win.

Because of that, I believe that this decision should be tabled until we have a few months of the "new" system in the bank. Then we'll watch the "buy-and-hold" folks whine about losing out to the active traders. Razz
Back to top
geb9696
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:30 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing VP
Investing VP

Joined: 10 Nov 2005

Posts: 1550
This Month: 0

14991.43 e$

Net worth: 535,362.43
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I agree with Dave.
Back to top
nelaina
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 5:01 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 17 Nov 2005

Posts: 2128
This Month: 0
Location: new jersey
347419.41 e$

Net worth: 1,137,735.41
Portfolio Value: 131,148.00
Monthly Return:
-2.96%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

Dave Rathbun wrote:
Then we'll watch the "buy-and-hold" folks whine about losing out to the active traders. Razz


you have a point there Laughing
Back to top
poornewb
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:38 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Investing Manager
Investing Manager

Joined: 21 Nov 2005

Posts: 711
This Month: 0
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
192031.66 e$

Net worth: 197,581.66
Portfolio Value: 0.00
Monthly Return:
0.00%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

I didnt know about the new percentage calcs? I guess if it does them like you say dave we may want to wait and let you guys work on that rather than waste time getting the sim to average our monthly holdings. I would retract my yes bid to wait and see how it shakes out.

Either way Ben your running a great site here even if it made my return -99% I still dig the site and sim. Thanks to all who work and program it also.
Back to top
nelaina
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:43 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CFO
CFO

Joined: 17 Nov 2005

Posts: 2128
This Month: 0
Location: new jersey
347419.41 e$

Net worth: 1,137,735.41
Portfolio Value: 131,148.00
Monthly Return:
-2.96%
Trades this month: 0
Churn Rate: 0.00%

Items

poornewb wrote:
I didnt know about the new percentage calcs? I guess if it does them like you say dave we may want to wait and let you guys work on that rather than waste time getting the sim to average our monthly holdings. I would retract my yes bid to wait and see how it shakes out.

Either way Ben your running a great site here even if it made my return -99% I still dig the site and sim. Thanks to all who work and program it also.


i agreeeee with everything you said! Very Happy
Back to top
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 Page 3 of 3

www.eInvesting.com Forum Index » eInvesting Feedback » A call for diversity and trade price change.
Jump to:  




Penny Stock Simulator | What are e$? | Forum Rules | FAQ | Manage Your eInvesting Portfolio | Privacy Policy | Links
PcTechTalk | Club-tC | Lost Discussion | World Class Designs | Xtreme Tuning | Statistical Trading | Advertise with eInvesting!


Before acting on any advice or program you find here at eInvesting.com we strongly recommend that you seek independent & professional legal, tax and investment advice as to whether it is suitable for your particular needs and circumstances. Failure to seek personally tailored, detailed, professional advice prior to acting could lead you to act contrary to your own best interests and could lead to loss of money. eInvesting.com is not responsible for your actions, so do it right!

Powered by:phpBB VERSION 59
© 2005, 2006 eInvesting.com